Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.appliedaifoundation.org/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
What it does
The QHSE Investigation Report generates a comprehensive Quality, Health, Safety, and Environment investigation for a vessel. Rather than reviewing each domain in isolation, it scans all four QHSE areas in parallel, links cross-domain findings (e.g. a safety incident that traces back to a maintenance gap), and produces a single audit-ready report. This is the right skill when an issue might span multiple areas — accidents and incidents almost always do.QHSE domains covered
| Category | Areas | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Q — Quality | PMS, Defect Tracking, Forms, Internal Audits | Maintenance compliance, defect resolution, procedure adherence |
| H — Health | Crew, Medical, Welfare | Crew certification, fitness, MLC compliance |
| S — Safety | Incidents, Drills, Safety Equipment, ISM | Near-misses, drill compliance, safety-critical equipment |
| E — Environment | MARPOL, ORB, Waste Management, Emissions | Pollution prevention, environmental compliance |
When to use it
- “QHSE report”
- “QHSE investigation”
- “Generate QHSE for AQUILA”
- “Vessel QHSE report”
- Even a single-domain mention (“safety report”, “environmental review”) — cross-scanning catches issues the user might not have considered.
How it works
- Confirms the target vessel and the period to cover.
- Scans all four QHSE domains, pulling existing expert reviews and case data for each.
- Links findings across domains — for example, a safety incident on a fuel-system defect that was already flagged in the maintenance backlog.
- Builds a unified findings list with severity, status, and cross-references.
- Writes the formatted report with executive summary, per-domain findings, cross-cutting themes, and recommendations.
What the report contains
- Executive summary with overall QHSE posture
- Per-domain findings with severity and evidence links
- Cross-domain themes — issues that span more than one area
- Outstanding actions with owner and deadline
- Recommendations prioritised by safety impact
- Audit-ready evidence references
Why “always cross-scan”
Single-domain reviews miss systemic issues. A near-miss in Safety, an overdue critical PMS job in Quality, and a delayed spare in Procurement may individually look manageable — together they’re a chain that already failed once and will again. Cross-scanning is the point.Related skills
- maritime-report-generator — generic report templating including incident reports
- defect-analyzer, pms-analyzer, compliance-analyzer — single-domain reviews fed into this report
- status-rollup — fleet-wide QHSE aggregation